Someone freaked out over at ERStories because I referred to Ted Kennedy as a "poor bastard".
If he has GBM [Gliobastoma Mulitforme], hopefully they won’t torture the poor bastard by keeping him alive for very long with maximum interventions.
Here's part of the freak-out comment:
my Prayers to the Kennendy’s and I don’t think anyone should be referring to him as a “Poor Bastard”…There are still a few people in this world who know how to talk without being so outright disrespectful. It is scary that she is a nurse.
First of all, at least I know how to spell Kennedy correctly, put capital letters in the correct places, and omit any extraneous apostrophes when referring to the guy. That aside, I thought I'd explain to you the phenomenon of nurses referring to patients as a "poor bastard."
In the ER, the term "poor bastard" is deployed sparingly, but in very specific circumstances. First of all, I must say there is no female equivalent of which I'm aware, so being a poor bastard, first and foremost, means you're a male. You most certainly are not investigated for true "bastard" status in its literal sense. I don't ask you if your parents were married at the time of your birth, etc. It's idiomatic, you see. Primarily, it's a term of empathy. Like "here is a fella who has met a terrible fate".
The term is also used due to the frequent need and tendency to summarize cases to physicians and other nurses in the ER. When I go on break, the patients I have are not the same patients I had an hour ago, nor will they be the same ones I have an hour after that. A patient who arrives is usually unknown to the physician as well. You just get sick of saying "that guy" or saying the patient's name. Sometimes you need just
a little something extra to get your point across when talking about your patient's situation.
Like 10,005 times per shift, a doctor will say "who's in room 1?" I give a 3-sentence or so summary of the case, complete with what I think it is. If the patient meets criteria for poor bastard status, you may refer to him as a poor bastard.
So, who's in Room 1?
"Oh, that poor bastard has a history of bladder cancer with TURP and bladder resection, and is on chemo right now. He's been having dizziness, syncope, and near-syncope for the last few days. Blood pressure was 71/45 in triage, and I found no evidence of infection. Probably volume depletion based on history, so I'm giving him fluids."
The doctor will react with some sort of confirmatory statement such as "oh, that sucks" or make some other expression of empathy.
That's one example of appropriate use of the term "poor bastard." I used it in that case because he is in the midst of his struggle with cancer. While he is not facing imminent death, he has faced a bladder resection, TURP, and is going through chemo. He is unable to drink enough liquids due to chemo side-effects to keep his blood pressure up. Struggles with cancer involving surgeries, complications, and chemo make you a good candidate for "poor bastard" status, especially if you're an otherwise agreeable individual and/or have an agreeable family. Notably, if you lost your bladder to cancer several years ago or something, you are not a poor bastard unless you meet one of the other criteria. If you're a total asshole for some non-medical reason (rare in the cancer population, I've noticed), you probably won't win yourself a "poor bastard" designation. If you have a less-aggressive cancer which was cured with only a single surgery or is responding well to chemo/radiation with only relatively minor inconvenience or set-backs, you probably won't meet poor bastard status.
Another use is referring to the ultra-old crowd who are coming to the end of life from something like complications from Alzheimer's and the family is insisting on maximum interventions like intubation. Bonus points if the patient is emaciated, non-communicative, has multiple other medical issues, and is total care in general. Grandpa gets a pneumonia and the family decides he needs to be intubated. He has reached "poor bastard" status, although, most total-care Alzheimer's patients could reasonably be called "poor bastard" during any trip to the ER and not violate any of the ER usage rules for the term; however, the more common usage is as described above (old+emaciated+demented+inappropriate medical interventions). Any comatose, intubated ultra-old person is also a poor bastard even if they were high-functioning prior to the incident which landed them in that situation.
Notably, young people (such as the severely brain-injured) with similar issues are rarely called poor bastard, especially if the medical issues have been chronic for a long time. Most people we refer to as poor bastards are upper middle-age or older, and that's totally arbitrary.
The final common reason to deploy "poor bastard" when referring to a patient is the situation in which Ted Kennedy has found himself. That would be an unexpected, new, possibly life-ending diagnosis regardless of current patient status. In the early stages of a glioblastoma multiforme, you may be walking, talking, and chewing gum at the same time; however, everyone in the department knows you will rapidly decompensate over the next few months and turn into a total-care patient no matter what medical care is available to you. Like, we can see the future and the future doesn't look good. Bonus points if the patient was powerful or very healthy (such as a marathon runner, business owner, active elderly volunteer, or something else that totally contrasts with the diagnosis) at the time of diagnosis such that the diagnosis would turn them into a totally differently-functioning person and rip anyone's heart out who hears of the story. This situation is a judgment call though since you have to die some way, and usually requires a baseline high-level of functioning.
An already-decompensated elderly patient who is in the nursing home may not be a poor bastard with a new diagnosis of an aggressive brain tumor or metastasis to the brain, but would become a poor bastard if the family opted for intubation and/or craniotomy as described above.
So basically, as someone who has taken care of dozens of glioma/glioblastoma multiforme patients in my career (moreso in my former job on the neuro and neurosurgery unit), I know what he will likely go through. For the sake of discussion, I'll assume he has a GBM, a common and highly aggressive primary brain tumor in the older population.
GBM patients have "tumor debulking" craniotomies to extend life for a little bit of time. The tumor grows back, and they may have a couple of repeat surgeries for "palliative" reasons. The term "tumor debulking" is used because there is no hope of the surgery being curative. Despite these multiple debulkings, the patient goes downhill in a matter of months, usually to include headaches, tube feedings, paralysis, lethargy, and incontinence progressing to coma and then death. It's a shitty way to go, and the term "poor bastard" can properly used as an expression of empathy at any time from initial diagnosis to end-of-life by our rigorous standards.